温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.mr2.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-58735.html
点击访问原文链接

1985 NA sunroof white exterior w/ black interior [Archive] - Toyota MR2 Message Board

进入原网站 导航首页
1985 NA sunroof white exterior w/ black interior [Archive] - Toyota MR2 Message Board Toyota MR2 Message Board > The Toyota MR2 Marketplace > MR2s for Sale > MK 1 Cars > 1985 NA sunroof white exterior w/ black interior PDA

View Full Version : 1985 NA sunroof white exterior w/ black interior


lord_dover10-28-2010, 01:19 PM1985 Toyota MR2
naturally aspirated 4A-GE
manual transmission C50
sunroof
Super White paint
black interior
$700 obo

have title

must tow off lot, or can tow to nearby

needs only new battery and new tires

drove it around junk yard a year ago

have had for 5 years

most, if not all, pieces still intact

(609) 668-3400
Schoolhouse Road, Mount Holly, NJ 08060
near the corner of Forceville Drive & Schoolhouse Road

40.007763,-74.827409

40.007763,-74.827409 - Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=40.007763,-74.827409&num=1&t=h&sll=40.007188,-74.825724&sspn=0.003012,0.006947&ie=UTF8&ll=40.007747,-74.827495&spn=0.001506,0.003473&z=19)

This is being posted without the current owner's knowledge or consent. I just hate to see titled MR2s wasted or parted. muffinman10-28-2010, 01:29 PM1985 Toyota MR2
naturally aspirated
manual transmission
sunroof
Super White paint
black interior
$700 (firm)

have title

must tow off lot, or can tow to nearby

needs only new battery and new tires

drove it around junk yard a year ago

have had for 5 years

most, if not all, pieces still intact

(609) 668-3400
1?? Schoolhouse Road, Mount Holly, NJ 08060
near the corner of Forceville Drive & Schoolhouse Road

40.007763,-74.827409

40.007763,-74.827409 - Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=40.007763,-74.827409&num=1&t=h&sll=40.007188,-74.825724&sspn=0.003012,0.006947&ie=UTF8&ll=40.007747,-74.827495&spn=0.001506,0.003473&z=19)

This is being posted without the current owner's knowledge or consent. I just hate to see titled MR2s wasted or parted.

:ugh: fvillota10-28-2010, 01:59 PMwait... the owner dosent know you posted?
so he/she dont know its being sold? ..... lord_dover10-28-2010, 09:38 PMNo, they are selling it. They posted a crappy ad in the local Craigslist, as a parts car. I went and looked at it to see if I could get the exhaust from it, and it was all in one piece. Talking with him more,, he revealed all the other info on this ad. When I asked if he would sell the whole car with title, he said $700 firm. If he still has it in January, I'll buy it and get it road legal; but in the mean time, giving this forum a chance to buy it. That phone number in this ad is his from his ad. muffinman10-29-2010, 12:43 AMIMO it's not worth the $700. :( Kiroshino10-29-2010, 10:27 AMOriginal CL Ad: 1985 toyota mr2 (http://southjersey.craigslist.org/pts/1988901091.html)

Ditto muffinman. It's not worth the $700. I've been watching MR2's on NJ Craigslist for over a year now, and you could get an AW11 in much better shape for around the same price if you're patient. A few months ago, there were two for $300 and $500 that ran and had a lot less rust/rot. lord_dover11-04-2010, 10:11 AMAs with any free market, something is worth as much as someone actually pays for it. Whether or not it is a good or great deal, like the mentioned $300 cars, is easy to say. Just because someone was willing to sell an amazing car for almost nothing, does not mean those selling barely running cars for more are bad deals. Like, if some charitable nut decided to sell his mint Ferrari for $300, you would be an idiot to say that any Ferrari in worse condition is not worth more than $300. Yes, I just called you idiots (for your ignorant comments on market/economy), but I do not want to fight about it. muffinman11-04-2010, 10:45 AMAs with any free market, something is worth as much as someone actually pays for it. Whether or not it is a good or great deal, like the mentioned $300 cars, is easy to say. Just because someone was willing to sell an amazing car for almost nothing, does not mean those selling barely running cars for more are bad deals. Like, if some charitable nut decided to sell his mint Ferrari for $300, you would be an idiot to say that any Ferrari in worse condition is not worth more than $300. Yes, I just called you idiots (for your ignorant comments on market/economy), but I do not want to fight about it.



You come on here and you post a FS thread on someone elses rusty junkyard turd for $700 dollars and we're the idiots. It's cool i'm not mad , i've been called worse.:D

I just spoke to a guy yesterday who has a running 87 and is asking $500 (or make any offer) for a much nicer looking car than the one you posted. Why are you getting so worked up about someone elses car?





here's the pics lord_dover11-04-2010, 01:36 PMI did not use a single all caps word, nor exclamation point.

That particular example you showed is a great deal, indeed. Kiroshino11-04-2010, 01:45 PMIf I remember correctly (probably not), only the market value of the final good (MR2) produced domestically (Japan) is factored toward the GDP of the year it was produced (1984 or 1985). So none of this has anything to do with the US economy directly.

Consumer confidence, on the other hand, is tied to economic trends. More specifically, economic trends influence consumer spending, which in turn may convince companies to invest. Nevertheless, the sale and purchase of used goods, especially via private sales, doesn't influence the economy or market at all.

Case in point, it doesn't matter if a used MR2 sold for a million dollars or a single dollar; after it is initially sold (or produced), it ceases to have anything to do with the economy. The value we assign to the MR2 is not market value, but the value we place on it. In general, we don't tend to place a high value (relative to other sales of AW11's) on a car that looks to be in too poor shape to even be a parts car. muffinman11-04-2010, 01:46 PMI did not use a single all caps word, nor exclamation point.


What?:confused: stu4u311-11-2010, 11:58 AMWhat?:confused:

+ 1 WHAT? lord_dover11-11-2010, 12:07 PMMeaning I am not worked up about anything. You are mistaken about my attitude. muffinman11-11-2010, 01:36 PMMeaning I am not worked up about anything. You are mistaken about my attitude.

What? :rofl: lord_dover11-11-2010, 01:41 PMWhy are you getting so worked up about someone elses car?


I did not use a single all caps word, nor exclamation point.


Meaning I am not worked up about anything. You are mistaken about my attitude. muffinman11-11-2010, 01:43 PMJust ******* with you Ted! :lol: TonyHuynhTwo11-21-2010, 07:30 PMIf I remember correctly (probably not), only the market value of the final good (MR2) produced domestically (Japan) is factored toward the GDP of the year it was produced (1984 or 1985). So none of this has anything to do with the US economy directly.

Consumer confidence, on the other hand, is tied to economic trends. More specifically, economic trends influence consumer spending, which in turn may convince companies to invest. Nevertheless, the sale and purchase of used goods, especially via private sales, doesn't influence the economy or market at all.

Case in point, it doesn't matter if a used MR2 sold for a million dollars or a single dollar; after it is initially sold (or produced), it ceases to have anything to do with the economy. The value we assign to the MR2 is not market value, but the value we place on it. In general, we don't tend to place a high value (relative to other sales of AW11's) on a car that looks to be in too poor shape to even be a parts car.

Not to be a critic, but I just saw some fallacious statements on economics in your post. Oh and that car is definitely not worth $700.

1. Anything bought and sold in the United States has a direct impact on the U.S. economy. Products that are imported in this case an MR2 would affect the trade balance. In the case of buying an MR2 it would affect the capital account of the U.S. and Japan. Japan would be transferring the asset over to the United States, and the United States would be transferring currency. A direct economic transaction for both countries. The production value would be figured into Japan's GDP, so you're right on the fact that it doesn't affect the United States GDP, but wrong on the fact that it does directly affect the U.S. economy.

2. After an asset is sold into the United States it is still part of the United States economy. It will never affect the production value of the US (GDP) but it is factored into the balance sheet as an asset, of course the value of this asset is an aggregate number of all the other cars owned by the U.S. Anything that has value, even clean air is part of the economy (reason the department of the interior employs so many greedy economists).

3. Market value has nothing to do with GDP. The market value of a good is just the equilibrium between a sellers willingness to pay and buyers willingness to buy.

A good example of this is the financial markets, more specifically equity. Often times we hear the market value of a stock is x amount of dollars. Unless the stock is an IPO buying and selling of the stock doesn't directly pull money or bring money into the company. The only time the company made any money in the stock market was during the IPO of their stock.

Just the same if I was selling an MR2, that MR2 would have a market value based on the price other similar MR2's have sold for. If I sold the car for more money than other MR2's in similar conditions have sold for than I sold it above market value and vice versa for selling below market value.

4. The only thing GDP measures in an economy is production. There are a ton of other economic barometers that measure economic activity that don't have anything to do with production but it's still economic activity, M1/M2, capital accounts, current accounts, etc.

Sorry I'm just another long winded economist. 858911-22-2010, 07:17 PMI read all the replies but I didn't open the pics of the alleged 'deal", I got under the impression the guy was right n most everybody else wrong..then I open the pics..is a royal POS!

Good intentions prevail regardless condition (quote): hate to see titled MR2s wasted or parted.
Thanks for trying. Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.

智能索引记录